Massive Assault
http://www.massiveassault.com/forum/

Centura
http://www.massiveassault.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=2035
Page 6 of 8

Author:  Enforcer [ Thu Jun 23, 2005 5:21 am ]
Post subject: 

were there any twin island games?

Author:  Maelstrom [ Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:32 am ]
Post subject: 

None. Shura-by of TGE is playing against half the armies involved, and he only has MA. This spreads, as anyone who has a planet picked for them already (in this case NP) will have to play that same map for all of their games in order for Least turns to work. So in the end everyone had to play the MA only map.

Author:  Enforcer [ Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:15 am ]
Post subject: 

shame, not played TI the war yet.

Author:  Enforcer [ Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

War week ended, movement orders due 9am thursday.

Brett Shaw and twestedbutfun2 have done well managing 17 turns on New Paradise in 3 days. Talk about speed guys :)

Author:  Enforcer [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:35 am ]
Post subject: 

Incase ppl were wondering how the war was going and who was winning:

Based on the following values.
Low: 2
Medium: 3
High: 4

And as the rules state to win u need to control (number of clans in ur alliance+1/total number of clans at start)

So a solo clan needs 2/6 of the total points, an allaince of 2 clans needs 3/6 etc..

Anyway here is a total of 98 points on the map so a solo player needs:

(98/6)*2=32.6 (33)

so:
NWO-TGE alliance: 43/49
FOR-PW-ROTM alliance: 51/66

individual results (33 needed):
TGE: 28
FOR: 20
PW: 16
ROTM: 15
NWO: 15
SWORD: 0

Couple of questions:

Should the elimination of a clan reduce the number of clans to 5 for purposes of determining when someone has won. (Would change ammount needed to 40 for individuals)
If a clan hits the individual ammount are they declared the winner if they are in an alliance? What's to stop them leaving the alliance to claim the win?

Author:  Maelstrom [ Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:27 am ]
Post subject: 

Enforcer wrote:
Based on the following values.
Low: 2
Medium: 3
High: 4


If I remember right, weren't we using the percent of income received as the overall indicator? Basically the difference there is that it accounts for territories that are currently being contested, as each contested system's income is reduced.

In this case we have the following values:
TGE: 30.8%
FOR: 22.0%
NWO: 16.4%
SWORD: 0.0%
PW: 15.7%
ROTM: 15.1%

Note that with this, we don't have to worry about eliminated clans. As far as total for control, we definately should count only non-eliminated clans.

With the Balance needed to win being set to (# of clans in alliance + 1 / Total Active Clans )

we have 2/5 = 40% balance needed for solo, 3/5 = 60% balance needed for 2 clans, 4/5 = 80% balance for 3 clans.

How the alliances stack up:
NWO/TGE: 47.2% of 60% needed
FOR/ROTM/PW: 52.8% of 80% needed

A cursory look at this shows that it'll be nearly impossible for the 3 clan alliance to win anytime soon. Then again, they have a lot of advantages in being able to field more total armies, so whatever the solution, they still should have a difficult time.

Author:  Xantrul [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:28 am ]
Post subject: 

Move phase ended

second round battle in NW9 started.



Maelstrom, what about RMJ's army in East sector ? He won his battle and will participate in second round. I can't give his army to you because your army survived as well. Should I sell back his army, or give it to another player (if other clans agree) ?

Antonio, the same question for you about MadJazz. His army wil take several New Paradise battles in second round. Should I replace him ?

Author:  MadJazz [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:49 am ]
Post subject: 

It looks like it would be just 2 new TGE games in East this week.

If that's the case I'll take them on and then see how it goes.

Also, is it possible to split the games between two players? I mean so that the actual unit stays the same (MadJazz(G) in this case), but somebody else with same or lower rank playes some of it's games. Of course, the order would be predefined so that there is no advantage in rejecting a bad starting position.

Author:  Enforcer [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:24 am ]
Post subject: 

don't see a problem with someone taking some of the games, u would both be treated as the same unit for pusposes of turn limits etc. Would ahve to be a eprson same or lower raning and a player with no unit in that system alrdy.

Author:  Enforcer [ Sun Jul 03, 2005 7:00 am ]
Post subject: 

update done.
Tiger vs pickardj79 in NW11 has been ajudicated in Tiger's favour. Round 2 battles have been started in NW11.

Movement orders due Thursday 9am

Author:  MadJazz [ Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:04 am ]
Post subject: 

I won't have time to play new games in East.

Please replace my unit with somebody else.

Thanx

Author:  Tiger [ Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:20 am ]
Post subject: 

Is it possibe to replace B.Kloppt at least in the games which ones were not started?
For example, 2 battles in the SW5.

Author:  Drakon [ Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:49 am ]
Post subject: 

Tiger wrote:
Is it possibe to replace B.Kloppt at least in the games which ones were not started?
For example, 2 battles in the SW5.

There are also several games not started in Centura...

Author:  Drakon [ Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:10 am ]
Post subject: 

May be it'll be better just to cancel all not sturted games with B.Kloppt?
It's a fact that many Players at present have incredible number of games - it's really hard to play...

P.S. What about me - I'm almost going crazy already playing additionally the Tournaments!!!

Author:  Xantrul [ Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:03 am ]
Post subject: 

Move phase ended

No changes on map.

If B.Kloppt won't start to play before next will, I'll replace him for SW 5 sector.
As for Centura, Conqueror timeouted him there on 1st turn. Restarting his games there useless now. But I can replace B.Kloppt there and restart all his battles, including Conqueror's, if clanleaders want to do it.

Warchris, please, choose replacement for B.Kloppt. Or may be he'll play soon ?

Author:  Xantrul [ Sun Jul 10, 2005 4:15 am ]
Post subject: 

Week ended

Cash generated.
No changes on map.


B.Kloppt didn't started to play. But I can't replace him even in SW 5, because nobody selected replacement.

Author:  warchrisMA [ Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

as b Kloppt seems to have still problem to play (he had a car incident i got no more news from his brother)

so you can replace him by me i got more time.
our level are roughtly the same (may be he is better then me)

Author:  Drakon [ Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

warchrisMA wrote:
so you can replace him by me i got more time.

If you're able to make 1 turn per day - I don't mind.
Otherwise I suggest to cancel the all games with B.Kloppt.

Author:  Xantrul [ Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:11 am ]
Post subject: 

Move phase ended

Second round battles started in East.
B.Kloppt replaced in SW 5. His unit in Centura removed.


Victim of the week is Melkiot. He got 7 new games on New Paradise :-?

Author:  Enforcer [ Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:18 am ]
Post subject: 

War updated, nothing interesting to report.

Movement order due 9am Thursday gmt.

Page 6 of 8 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/